![]() |
|
![]() |
|
57,
Woodstock Road, Tel
01865 292047
It is the right time for a provocative entry on this web site that has been up for nearly nine years. The specific purpose of the web site, especially after November 2002, has been to establish whether vaccines and particularly mercury contained in some vaccines is incriminated in autism. We have never subscribed to the idea that MMR causes autism. Quite clearly, especially since November 2002, we have believed that mercury is seriously implicated in the worldwide epidemic of autism. MMR has been no more than a bit player in this saga. No doubt to the satisfaction of the small coterie of companies who comprise the huge international vaccine cartel which has known all along that the real culprit DTP, given at two, three and four months of age does the real damage. Unfortunately for parents and babies MMR, given at about twelve to fifteen months, can coincide with the visible onset of autism thus cloaking the true cause of harm. MMR could probably tip the balance in the case of a child seriously harmed by DTP but whom so far has escaped the worst of vaccine damage. Ask about the Simpsonwood, Georgia vaccine conference of 2000. The secret conference, that is, at which the vaccine industry panicked about the overwhelming realisation that autism is a manmade condition for which they are exclusively culpable. Brought about solely by the massively increased use of the second most toxic material known to man, mercury, used as a means of preserving multidose vaccines. Then injecting this compound into the bodies of tiny infants! That's the horror story. We think a better story is on the cards in the near future. We say that autism will come to an end when the very last mercury-containing vaccine shots are taken away by the dangerous materials disposals squad as is every other drop of mercury lawfully and safely disposed of in the western world. Of course we should have known something was amiss! All the time our health departments were telling us that mercury in vaccines was safe they were agreeing behind closed doors in international public health bodies that that the last mercury mine in the world in a former Soviet Socialist Republic should close. All future supplies of mercury will be met from recycled materials. Of course it was never harmful was it? Very convincing! Lastly we should say that we believe we played our part in this happy ending which must eventually mean the end of autism. Our hero of the moment is Professor Boyd Haley of the University of Kentucky. Boyd showed in a gruesome demonstration that mercury compounded with testosterone becomes 100 times more toxic than either material on its own. Its effect upon snail brains under the electron microscope was horrific. Everyone knows that testosterone is involved in autism and may also know that testosterone fluctuates wildly in the womb and during early infancy. It accounts perhaps for the gender disparity between affected boys and girls where the former outnumber the latter between four and five to one. It may also be the cruel determinant that searches out the one in a hundred infants who are affected by the disorder. In February 2004 at an international vaccine conference in the USA Professor Boyd Haley repeated a claim made by our Director Tony Bateson in Arlington, Virginia in 2002 that there were seemingly no unvaccinated autistic people in the United Kingdom. Despite this being rubbished by Professor Elizabeth Miller of the UK Department of Health, UK delegates returned to Britain and almost immediately advised the Government to withdraw the use of mercury in childhood vaccines as soon as possible. On 6th August 2004 the Government announced the overnight replacement of mercury-containing childhood vaccines to take place on 31 August 2004. If most children do escape autism in the future through avoiding these jabs those who became autistic after failing to avoid them in the six months between February and September 2004 could hold UK Health officials wholly responsible. Professor Elizabeth Miller should head the list for her specious rebuttal of the claim that there were no autistic unvaccinated individuals in the UK by claiming that 95% of all children were vaccinated and it would naturally be hard to find autistic individuals in the unvaccinated 5%. Professor Miller must know almost better than any single person in the UK that her figures were a gross underestimate that could only have one purpose. Professor Miller could have said that the claim was simply incorrect but she chose to attack the arithmetic. People aren't fools they can work out numbers for themselves. We heard within days of the conference that key advisors were recommending that the UK Government should rapidly close down the use of mercury in infant vaccines. But it took six months during which time up to 300,000 children could have been vaccinated with this toxic and dangerous product. Officials continued with business as usual even though the decision had been taken to withdraw its use within weeks or days of the conference. For years the UK Government has, along with others, referred to so called research findings that vaccines were safe. There are no such findings, all the evidence points the other way. In the only known truly full and frank debate on vaccine safety, that was Simpsonwood albeit a closed debate, it was said that 'a staggering number of earlier studies linked mercury with developmental conditions'. The drugs cartel which largely funds medical research worldwide distorts what it can and buries what it can't including Simpsonwood. The
whole thing is founded upon a corrupt system in which 'lab rats' are
paid to test drugs and then the results are foisted upon doctors who
are bribed to inject the stuff into as many infants as possible. All
of this is conducted in an environment that is held up to be clinical
and pure but is in reality awash with money and corrupt cartel like
practices. How could this evil mega profit making industrial cartel
pull the wool over the eyes of so many parents? How complicit is a government
that pursues a public policy that terrifies parents into delivering
their helpless infant offspring into a brutal confrontation with a needle
that delivers mercury? |